Audio Download

Breasts: Signatory of The Mother of All Living, Nourishing Spiritually, Ruling Coitally, Part 6

[Study Aired March 14, 2026]

Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe;
let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love. Pro 5:19

The lonely Adam in Eden, upon seeing the breathtaking beauty of his wife, Eve, is unwittingly and intrinsically the first to experience the lust of his eyes, his wife, ‘wise in her conceits’. Eve, although of him, has had most of her masculine traits weakened, and Adam’s feminine characteristics in her have been dramatically amplified. She is now drawn to pretty things and deeply emotional sentiments characteristically emanating from her breasts, ruling her every thought equally lustily:

Rom 12:16  Be of the same mind one toward another. Mind not high things, but condescend to men [ADAM] of low estate. [Eve] Be not wise in your own conceits. 

Eph 5:21  Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God [By one’s God-given gender specific authority over a matter]

Eden is brimming with new and incredible experiences for the flesh and mind, a veritable sensory overload, particularly for Eve’s interpretations. Adam and Eve’s minds were like blank sheets being rapidly inscribed with these experiences. Now, God intrigues the ‘children’s’ slowly emerging god-like status, which involves wanting to be like their Father and knowing his business. Eve, gazing upon a serpent, emblematically lounging leisurely in the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, and she, being the designed “weaker vessel” subject to emotional impulsivity, hears the Serpent’s whispered thought questioning her Lord’s direct command not to eat of that tree.

Scripture seems to state that the Serpent audibly conversed with Eve, but it appears that Adam didn’t hear the Serpent’s voice, even though he was right there beside Eve. Their dialogue could very well have classically been via the spirit of the power of the air, whispered to Eve’s mind. At the same time, she, naturally using her amplified feminine sensitivities, was more easily corrupted, gazing lustily upon the fruit in deep thought, spiritually bitten by the emblematic Serpent—miffed that God should withhold some vital information — treating her like a child (that similarly many years later, likewise intrigued the Sodomites to know the Angels of the Lord – Gen 19:5), a pre-epicurean instinct to question all things and judge for and by oneself—Adam and Eve both utterly unconscious that their actions, characteristic in the flesh of the Bride’s journey, were necessary to lead to life, the very subject the Serpent twisted ‘inventively’ (Eccl 7:29).

Gen 3:4  And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 

(Isa 28:18  And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.)

Gen 3:5  For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil [Life and death]. 

Heb 2:14  Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; 

Num 21:8  And the LORD said unto Moses, Make thee a fiery serpent, and set it upon a pole: and it shall come to pass, that every one that is bitten, when he looketh upon it, shall live. 

To follow more easily the sorrowful saga of Adam’s wilful rejection of his Lord’s command not to eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, it is critical to understand that Adam’s rejection of his God’s commands epitomises mankind’s now-cursed rejection of Christ’s commands now, and like Sodomites and Epicureans, glorying in the conceit of their counsel (Act 17:18).

Signified by the power of her breasts, Eve, the Mother of All Living, signified by her daughters today, is not at all ashamed of her breast exposure—in insolence, subtly expressing authority.

The representation of authority is a perspective found in discussions of reclaiming female power and self-respect, as well as in the deconstruction of traditional modesty standards very early in history. Today, they are significantly more prominent, symbolising a reclaiming of the narrative surrounding breasts—viewing them as emblems of strength, nourishment, and agency, duplicitously forcing them not to be seen as sexual objects while brazenly presenting them so. This shift empowers women to exercise authority over their own bodies.

Because of pride, shame initially for 7,000 years, does not evoke emotions significant for change, as modelled by Eve’s bright and singular observance that if they ate of the forbidden fruit, they would ‘not surely die,’ ultimately emboldening much later the Israelites to say, ‘Is not the LORD among us?’ None evil can come upon us.‘ (Mic 3:11). Similar to Orthodox Christianity, believing that they are saved now is the doctrine. An emotionally based, insidious delusion foundational to all idols of the heart doctrinal challenges, without the multitude of Elders’ counsel, too frequently seen taking once deemed spiritually mature men and women right out of the Body of Christ.

Pro 25:28  He that hath no rule [restraint, control, like King Saul – almost always, emotionally] over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls. 

In classic treachery, Saul had the nerve to emotionally defame his wife, Ahinoam, as a perverse and whorish woman (1Sa 20:30) when all along, it was he, the King, and representative Priest of Israel, who, with runaway emotions ruling him worse than women or youth! His decision-making process is similarly self-elevating, fruitless and in disarray (Jas 1:6-8).

1Sa 20:30  Then Saul’s anger was kindled against Jonathan, and he said unto him, Thou son of the perverse rebellious woman, do not I know that thou hast chosen the son of Jesse to thine own confusion, and unto the confusion of thy mother’s nakedness?

Zep 3:4  Her prophets [Formerly characteristic of we, the Priests, descendants of Adam and Eve’s impudence] are light and treacherous persons: her priests have polluted the sanctuary, they have done violence to the law. 
Zep 3:5  The just LORD is in the midst thereof; he will not do iniquity: every morning doth he bring his judgment to light, he faileth not; but the unjust [All mankind] knoweth no shame. 

1Co 6:5  I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? No, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren? 

Lev 26:18  And if ye will not yet for all this hearken unto me, then I will punish you seven times more for your sins. 
Lev 26:19  And I will break the pride of your power; and I will make your heaven as iron, and your earth as brass:

Our Lord designed the shape and form of young women centred on her breasts, such as were all the patriarchal wives, culminating in Abishag, emblematic of the Bride in transition, beautiful to behold (Gen 24:16, Gen 29:17, 1Sa 25:3, Est 2:7, Son 7:1) designed to be devastatingly (H7736) seductive and arousing to men. God harnessed her amplified female sensibilities to overrule husbands more easily when it suited her artifices and, indeed, all males, as males and husbands grappled with the troubling urge of their unwitting curse to submit to females. And now, the command for her to submit to a husband and honour and respect males of authority was a dictate, obscenely monstrous! Generally, its application is a good practice, effectively exercising instruction and sustaining wisdom in all social matters, particularly with men of authority (Gen 12:10-20, Eph 5:21). Sarah directly honoured and respected Abraham, referring to him as “Lord”, an example by its use, elegantly entrenching the order of Godly authority.

Female intelligence, comparable to that of males, is notably more influenced by hormones, often leading to differences in how they approach the same task. Consequently, females, despite being more susceptible to sensory overload, are often engaged in multitasking, whereas males tend to compartmentalise by prioritising the most urgent tasks. If a husband and wife are misaligned in their objectives, as is commonly observed, it is foreseeable that the husband’s authority will frequently challenge the wife’s unity. This dynamic is ultimately intended to guide the Bride towards comprehension of her subjection to Christ.

Eph 5:17  Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is. 

Upon reflecting on Adam and Eve’s humiliation in challenging God’s authority, the only person experiencing “shame for nakedness” is the Bride of Christ, as her Husband covers her spiritual and intellectual nakedness. Adam and Eve only felt physically naked, indicative of the greater spiritual nakedness that would remain with their descendants, the Israelites, the church, espoused to her Lord, her pride furnishing insult to her intelligence in being “subject” to his authority. It was her rejection of His authority that made her unconsciously spiritually naked—and she didn’t care so long as her female peers, more than her male neighbours, saw her as a proud, strong, autonomous, free and powerful woman, skillfully controlling her husband in her quest for authority. Where it suits, she demonstrates to the world that she is more than capable of making decisions for herself, all the while her subconscious, by the spirit of the power of the air (Eph 2:2), is indicting “whispered” nakedness, their conscience less and less, semi-consciously condemning them for not being covered by her husband’s word. Scripture doesn’t say that Satan directly told Adam and Eve that they were naked; the spirit of God induced it.

Gen 3:11  And he said, Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? 
Gen 3:12  And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.

Adam became aware of his nakedness by not listening to their Lord’s “whispered” command, rebuking Eve for her sentimentalities, preferring to listen to the Serpent, for the same reasons for becoming aware of her nakedness, only when the Lord challenged them, “Who told thee that thou wast naked?” and immediately answered his question.

Even though the descendants of Adam were momentarily aware, their consciences accusing or excusing them of disobeying their Lord’s commands, evoking a sense of nakedness, the shame of nakedness wasn’t referred to until Moses, upon coming down from Mt. Sinai with the Ten Commandments, saw Israel dancing naked before their new/same old golden calf god.

Exo 32:25  And when Moses saw that the people were naked; (for Aaron had made them naked unto their shame among their enemies)

Shame, as initially experienced by Adam and Eve, wasn’t a problem for the Israelites. Neither knew the Lord’s word to acknowledge the disobedience of rebellion, which engendered enough crushing humiliation for being so wise in their hearts.

Job 19:1  Then Job answered and said,
Job 19:2  How long will ye vex my soul, and break me in pieces with words?
Job 19:3  These ten times have ye reproached me: ye are not ashamed that ye make yourselves strange to me.
Job 19:4  And be it indeed that I have erred, mine error remaineth with myself. 
Job 19:5  If indeed ye will magnify yourselves against me, and plead against me my reproach:

Job 42:3  Who is he that hideth counsel without knowledge? Therefore have I uttered that I understood not; things too wonderful for me, which I knew not.
Job 42:4  Hear, I beseech thee, and I will speak: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me.
Job 42:5  I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee. 
Job 42:6  Wherefore I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes. 

Only now, in scripture, at least for Job, does the ‘shame’ of his nakedness result in humiliation.

Naked H6544 = 1. To lead, act as leader 2. To let go, let loose, ignore, let alone.

Shame H8103 from H8102 = 1. Whisper, derision, whispering. 1. Whisper, little [… meaning, God’s word is inconsequential.]

What appears to have happened is that to pacify the disgruntled Israelites’ perception of being ‘brought out to die in the wilderness,’ Aaron, just like Adam did with Eve, essentially, unwittingly gave them the idol of their hearts to celebrate their freedom from Egypt, and Eve, freedom from Adam’s perceived tyranny. Aaron didn’t want to have an insurrection on his hands, so, as later occurred many times in the Promised Land, they adopted the ways of the neighbouring tribes. Thus, they danced unashamedly naked to express their freedom and not be humiliated by a host of tedious and sensually restrictive laws. Similarly, represented by the emblematic power of the breast,  as Eve tested Adam, the Israelites tested Aaron. Consequently, Aaron’s ‘leadership’ ‘let loose’ [Naked H6544] in the Israelite’s a double deal of ‘nudge, nudge, wink, wink whisper’ that it would be alright to ‘ignore’ Moses’s commands whispered, just this time, first to appease the people and, secondly, in King Agag’s style (1Sa 15:32), to casually come before Moses in the hope of mollifying his wrath, expressed in Aarons words for his emasculated and feigned amazement… “and out came this calf”. 

The Israelites and people today have never had a problem with being physically naked! As women in fashion, they are far more ashamed of the humiliation of not being like their peers, their emblematic neighbours who are up with the latest fashion trends. They want to be “let alone” to choose by their will what is going to make them look outstanding (negatively unwittingly) among ‘the flocks of their Babylonian companions’ (Son 1:7). Likewise was Eve before Adam, wanting to “act as the “leader”, ashamed of not appearing as intelligent as he, that today’s feminists raucously enforce its (wry) oh, so male arousing message, painfully symbolic of Babylonian Christianity we all are escaping, no better demonstrated than Helen Reddy’s song from 1972, “I Am Woman”… (sardoncially) a little bit different to the 144,000’s song. Helen’ Ready’s song’s remembrance on the Eighth Day makes the ‘boss babe’s’ wish for the rocks to fall on them (Rev 3:18, 6:15-17) from the now cringing “shame” of their humiliating nakedness emanating iconically from her breasts’ power:

The Lyrics, to which we are all familiar:

I am woman, hear me roar
In numbers too big to ignore
And I know too much to go back and pretend
‘Cause I’ve heard it all before
And I’ve been down there on the floor
No one’s ever gonna keep me down again

Whoa, yes, I am wise
But it’s wisdom born of pain
Yes, I’ve paid the price
But look how much I gained
If I have to, I can do anything

I am strong [back chorus] (strong)
I am invincible (invincible)
I am woman (ooh)

You can bend, but never break me
‘Cause it only serves to make me
More determined to achieve my final goal
And I come back even stronger
Not a novice any longer
‘Cause you’ve deepened the conviction in my soul

Oh, yes, I am wise
But it’s wisdom born of pain
Yes, I’ve paid the price
But look how much I gained
If I have to, I can do anything

I am strong (strong)
I am invincible (invincible)
I am woman (ooh)

I am woman, watch me grow
See me standing toe to toe
As I spread my lovin’ arms across the land
But I’m still an embryo
With a long, long way to go
Until I make my brother understand

Whoa, yes, I am wise
But it’s wisdom born of pain
Yes, I’ve paid the price
But look how much I gained
If I have to, I can face anything

I am strong (strong)
I am invincible (invincible)
I am woman
I am woman (I am woman)
I am invincible (I am woman), I am strong
I am woman (I am woman)
I am invincible (I am woman), I am strong
I am woman (I am woman)
I am woman (I am woman) [end]

Resulting form the gelded Adam, representing men and husband’s submission, that “embryo” has indeed grown to maturity in every “I am Woman” ‘boss babe’, with her misappropriated femininity, challenging masculinity with her “invincibility”, is semi-consciously aware but profoundly delusional that, without the gender-specific masculine traits and interest in the mechanical workings of machinery, making society far more livable, she wouldn’t survive. The only recourse and trump card in her arsenal to very successfully fight back and sustain rulership is sexual gatekeeping; men, let alone husbands, never accessing her heart, at least for the decent men, she significantly reduces the field of choice. Of course, that action is terribly indicative of how we have haughtily treated our Husband, Christ, where he, too, is rejected, later guaranteed to “rule over us”.

Gen 3:16  Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee. 

Many of the women’s relationship struggles with men and husbands are highly valid. Her “I Am Woman” expressions are a result of testing his strength in a host of so-called ‘free’ sexual experiences, and she delightedly found them all to psychologically emasculate men’s headship; they now fawn over eroticised sensuality, ironically and psychopathically facilitated by her! That chaos classically represents Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots, mutinous thinking.

God designed us to need His patterned, espoused, heartfelt, and healthy connection, ideally a Jonathan-and-David-like love with the opposite sex, fulfilled spiritually. When a spouse experiences being shamed for their perceived foolishness, real or imagined, and especially sexually, a crushing sense of humiliation is felt. That shame is intrinsically in all men since Eden; that semi-conscious realisation that they bow to women and essentially their wives’ command of their sexuality and its signified headship is unavoidably like the proverbial ‘monkey on their backs’. One of the most humiliating accounts highlighting a man’s submission to his lusts is Amnon’s having made himself sick from lust for Tamar to the point he even feigned physical sickness to secure her attention. Compared to the Shulamite in the SoS, whose righteous lust for her groom made her “sick of love”, Amnon’s was an unrighteous, pathetic, cringing lust.

2Sa 13:1  And it came to pass after this, that Absalom the son of David had a fair sister, whose name was Tamar; and Amnon the son of David loved her.
2Sa 13:2  And Amnon was so vexed, that he fell sick for his sister Tamar; for she was a virgin; and Amnon thought it hard for him to do any thing to her. [meaning, no matter how he tried, he couldn’t win her affection]

Shame is a biological reaction to another’s or one’s self-judgment, often the humiliating perception of not being good enough or unlovable. When censored for some misdeed, particularly by someone we love or highly respect, and especially if amplified publicly, it rouses profound insult of one’s unintelligence or ignorance represented as “shame”, redirecting our attention away from the underlying core emotion felt as humiliation. Abruptly, you are forced to identify with the ‘shame’ statement rather than confront the frank topic of disagreement, which manifests as humiliation and is commonly followed by hiding. Exponentially, it is one of the most unbearable human experiences to be avoided at all costs (Gen 3:8), as it is often accompanied by lies and more lies to conceal the humiliation—predictably, the result of the righteous or unrighteous lust all felt in our breasts, radiation of the sensual and psychological to all parts of our body and mind.

Here is a reference to shame that identifies the action that is God-designed to humiliate at the appointed time for change:

1Ti 2:9  In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness [G127] and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;

Shamefacedness G127 = 1. A sense of shame or honour, modesty, bashfulness, reverence, regard for others, respect. From G1492 = 1. To see a. to perceive with the eyes b. to perceive by any of the senses c. to perceive, notice, discern, discover d. to see.

Heb 12:2  Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

Php 2:8  And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

1Co 11:13  Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
1Co 11:14  Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame [G820] unto him? 

Shame G820 = 1. Dishonour, ignominy, disgrace. H8103 = 1. Whisper, derision, whispering (Exo 32:25)

Shame  G808 = 1. Unseemliness, an unseemly deed (Rev 16:15)

Consequently, there’s a fine line of difference in the casually accepted meaning of “shame”. As Christ can attest, “shame”, like our conscience, awakens an underlying condition, and is not an emotion; instead, it names the condition that induces the feeling of humiliation, the catalyst for unrighteous flesh to hopefully motivate change, and for Christ, a kind of benign humiliation. Christ, being humbled by his flesh, lived in temporary humiliation, remaining unashamed, being clothed righteously in his word without sin (Phil 2:8-9). At the same time, those around him considered it a shame to be hung on a cross. Shame, at least for an Elect, encourages repentance to be free from the crushing humiliation of guilt of offending our Lord.

Act 8:33  In his [Christ’s] humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? For his life is taken from the earth.

Rev 3:18  I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.

However, humiliations, when combined with a multitude of sensory-generated emotions, mostly indicative of femininity, closely resemble an emotion, as the dreadful weight in our hearts and stomachs interprets it. Adam and Eve’s biblically referenced “shame” of their physical nakedness is a symbol of their humiliation for not being clothed in wisdom and intelligence to engender the expected satisfaction of knowing “good and evil”. Satan had already entered Eve’s mind, and, characteristic of women, Eve instinctively tested Adam’s strength of authority to resist her judgment to eat the forbidden fruit. Eve listened to the Serpent, and Adam listened to Eve, unified in their new father, the Devil.

Driven by their breasts, their hearts desire to rule, Eve’s and all women’s inherent nature to test a prospective husband’s moral and spiritual fortitude is, for a virtuous woman, a commendable principle that increases the chances of marital success. However, Eve set in motion an artifice for all women to test men to their now authoritative advantage, at odds with Christ’s commands, enacting a wilderness of marital dissonance. Adam, like all men and husbands, now semi-consciously worshipped women and their wives sensually.

Deu 6:14  Ye shall not go after other gods, of the gods [Ashtoroths, Diana, etc] of the people which are round about you; 
Deu 6:15  (For the LORD thy God is a jealous God among you) lest the anger of the LORD thy God be kindled against thee, and destroy thee from off the face of the earth.
Deu 6:16  Ye shall not tempt the LORD your God, as ye tempted him in Massah. 
Deu 6:17  Ye shall diligently keep the commandments of the LORD your God, and his testimonies, and his statutes, which he hath commanded thee.

Jas 3:14  But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth. 
Jas 3:15  This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. 
Jas 3:16  For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work. 
Jas 3:17  But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.
Jas 3:18  And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace. 

Eve, upon eating the forbidden fruit, unwittingly evoked her curse before God verbalised it. With her conscience condemning her, what she felt was the humiliation of being disenthroned before Adam and God, and that is what she fled, more than the shameful guilt of disobedience. It was her pride driving the idol of her heart, ever since, demonstrated in her sisterhood’s unrepentant rulership over husbands, which is the shameless humiliation she contends to this day. Adam, unwilling to forsake his lust for Eve, having resigned the opportunity in the Garden for repentance irretrievably, joined her flight.

His shame, resulting in the trauma of humiliation, is his irreversible subservience to her, dictated by his privy’s incontestable demands, in turn, ruled by all that her breasts represent. Her heart is now in perpetual need to be comforted, loving the attention, disobliging appeasement, expertly avoiding the terrible reminder of her humiliation— representatively, his privy. At the same time, he rejects Christ’s spiritual authority to sustain his lust for the flesh, all the while groaning that his wife rejects his intimacy. Both of them, without being dragged to Christ’s spirit, will always be bewildered for the twain never meeting in enthusiastic agreement; she rejecting his unwitting Christ-like earnest need for espoused intimacies, and she, her relentless lust for romanticism without espoused intimacies. That stubborn condition covertly is spiritual whoredom, as typified by Old Israel; their witchcraft, of stubbornly sticking to their pride, worked upon each other, condemning them and the nations of the world within to marital disunity.

Isa 14:11  Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, and the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.
Isa 14:12  How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
Isa 14:13  For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 
Isa 14:14  I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. 

Only the Bride of Christ is given to righteously ascend above the heights of the clouds to sit upon the mount of the congregation in the sides of the north.

Mankind instinctively resists acknowledging wrongdoing, as it implies accepting a higher authority’s judgment by a seemingly dictatorial Law. Typically, we go to the Swami’s, gurus, and Christian soothsayers seeking smoother, more feminine, and accommodating pacification of humiliations, quite like Adam’s tender understanding and comforting of Eve—he knows from experience, hoping that it will conclude with a sexual encounter—soundly unified, yet strangely unsatisfying in the unwitting spirit of a different father (Joh 8:44).

As with Adam and Eve representing us trying to mollify and forget our Lord’s spirit, here’s a word-for-word quote from a Swami on how to stop regretting the past and insidiously substantiating substitutionary atonement: the Host’s question to the Swami,

“What advice would you give to someone to be a bit easier on themselves?” Guru’s answer: “The regret of the past, many times, drains our energy so much that it blocks even our creativity for the future. Instead of just saying something was imperfect, and you moved from imperfection to perfection, you should always put your attention— ‘yeah, I’m moving from one level of perfection to another level of perfection’. In this sense, you will stop regretting what happened in the past”.

The same soothing delusion is in the lilting song from the 1973 stage classic, “Jesus Christ Superstar”; its subtle jibe, ironically, is soothed by a woman and is synonymous with Eve’s regret and the resultant humiliation. The song, led by a female, comically supports the doctrines and works of Orthodox Christianity by a feminised Jesus, which the Elect once, and to varying degrees of unease, supported. I won’t take the time here to play the song, but listen closely, and let the words speak for themselves: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qV9C6Am8xzk

It all insidiously began with Adam’s first sin of listening and obeying his wife’s logic rather than the Lord’s word, unwittingly heralding the beginning of mankind’s 7,000-year-long deep sleep (Gen 2:21) of spiritual harlotry, forced upon Eve by her submissive husband, now characterises all women as representing mankind’s corresponding harlotry. At the same time, all Adams of the world bizarrely blame Eve, and indirectly, their Lord; their treacherous instigations are rarely, if ever, recognised—deftly avoiding introspection since the honest implication would demand obedience, and so, it is innately easier on one’s soul to accuse, excuse and hide. As the song says, “close your eyes; everything is alright” while pushing to the back of their minds the rich man agonisingly asking Lazarus for a drop of water to cool his tongue. It’s not their fault. God designed it all to eventually give him the occasion to destroy all flesh. But, it all started in the Garden, with Eve’s breast’s power of her entire arresting form over Adam’s breast.

Pro 11:29  He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind: and the fool [Adam and we] shall be servant to the wise [subtle] of heart.

Gen 3:8  And they heard the voice of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day: and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God amongst the trees of the garden.

Gen 3:12  And the man said, The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.

Paradoxically, all eyes unjustly remain on the Woman now labelled insultingly forever (7,000 years) a whore—while Adam, accusing and excusing himself, shuffles his feet, trying to look innocent (Rom 2:15).

Of course, the focus of scripture from Eden to the beginning of Eighth Day never leaves the heroine’s journey enigmatically represented by a man, the New Adam emergent in Christ within her. How ambiguous to Babel, Babylonian Orthodoxy etched in its namesake—”confusion” – H894. Nurtured at the breasts of the Great Whore, no wonder they reach for another sickly doughnut and milky latte.

Nowhere in Genesis does it state that the Devil appeared literally as a serpent speaking with Eve. Even Babylonian Christianity recognises that evil spirits are a tool of God to invade our minds. Yet, we do not realise that it symbolises the poison of asps’ delirium that has the distinct capacity, as it did Eve, to beguile our every thought spiritually—the definitive act of divination.

Eph 2:2  Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
Eph 2:3  Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and [The incipient Bride was…] were by nature the children of wrath, even as others [remaining in Babylon]. 

H5175 Serpent – 1. Serpent, snake. From 5172 – 1. To practice divination, divine, observe signs, learn by experience, diligently observe, practice fortunetelling, take as an omen a. (Piel) 1. To practice divination 2. To observe the signs or omens. Strong’s: A primitive root; properly to hiss, that is, whisper a (magic) spell [in one’s mind]; generally to prognosticate [meaning to prophesy].

1Sa 10:6  And the spirit of the LORD [H7307 – 1. Wind, breath, mind, spirit a. breath] will come upon thee, and thou shalt prophesy with them, and shalt be turned into another man [first negatively, the father of lies, following, positively, the mind of Christ all whispered in our hearts and minds spiritually].

Typically, throughout Scripture, Satan, the prince of the power of the air, signifies him speaking to our easily malleable minds, governed by our heart beneath our breast, listening to the far smoother, beguiling sentimentalities that are designedly more easily received by the ‘weaker vessel’, Eve, denoting all women to whom, and proven by Adam, men idolise and submit, prosecuting all husbands and men of lust and idol worship. Consequently, because Adam loved, more likely lusted after everything Eve, he, too, being subject to emotions and sensual desires, his conscience not strong enough to resist, knowing full well, he rejected his Lord’s command, listened to her and ate—setting the path taken by all husbands with their wives and humanity rejecting Christ.

Luk 14:26  If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.

Gen 3:17  And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for THY SAKE; [Caps Grant’s] in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;

Adam, having effectively abdicated his headship over his wife, Eve, condemned all husbands for 6,000 years, for women, particularly wives, assuming unsettled control in marriage, and indeed, in all governmental portfolios, and for a further symbolic 1,000 years of uneasy truce under the Rod of Iron.

Isa 3:12  As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

Women, particularly wives, are expected to be submissive to their husbands and honour and respect males in general, thereby facilitating the passage of peaceful submission to authority in their hearts. Women, represented by Eve, incensed that Adam had let her down, were originally and inscrutably designed by God to find regulated boundaries righteously imposed upon them by a husband’s mirroring of Christ’s word, peculiarly ravishing! That intriguing reality was all but destroyed by a flaming sword, now protecting its powerful message, condemning men and women to relentlessly search for the answer to their espoused incongruity, for the overwhelming majority of whom, bar the Bride, it would never be found. 

Adam, being the first created, God instituted the narrow yet straightforward way of obedience to His order of headship from the Father, through the Word. Adam and his Wife and their Children, the World, later learned this gladly in the descending scale of submission. Adam’s troubled intentional rejection (1 Tim 2:14) of that order, complicated by listening to his Wife’s logic, forced his wife and mankind into the broad way of becoming an emblematic spiritual harlot. Her intrinsic compulsion to bear children, now cursed with the mental scars of Adam meekly letting her down (Deut 23:1), not stopping her eating of the forbidden fruit, sullies forever her method of seeking the love and respect she deserved and craved, now, and for Babylon impossible to find; a curse upon all women and the churches they represent (Gen 3:20). Enigmatically initiated by Adam, and now highlighted by the inherent, Eve-induced tendency in females towards compulsive sentimentality, is now emblematic and characteristic of mankind’s placid, impotence, unravished spiritually, the concept of harlotry is conceptualised!

Unwittingly, and since Satan is now Adam and Eve’s father, Eve, being deeply hurt by Adam’s self-emasculated headship, stridently feels the need to step up to the plate, unconsciously compulsively seizing gifted headship, representing the multitude of churches she spawned, now overwhelmingly denoting 200,000,000 scheming, ensnaring, manipulative contrivances representative of mankind’s chaotic, childish, ensnaring contrivances! (Eccl 7:29)

Now, by God’s design, all women, specifically everyday Babylonian Christian wives who are physically virtuous, are unwittingly condemned to a life of spiritual harlotry—how? Perhaps the most distinctive example is King (A-ha-sure-rus’s) Ahasuerus’s wife, Queen Vashti, who was renowned for her outstanding beauty. In marriage, she was exceptionally well-acquainted with a husband’s sensual desire that only she could rightly satiate. By refusing the King’s request to present her outstanding beauty to all the noblemen and women at his banquet, she showed the kingdom who truly ruled, thereby deeply humiliating the King before the nation. Quintessentially, as do all husbands to their wives, he was made to pay a heavy tribute to her command, as equivalent in monetary value as a man with a whore—for Queen Vashti, Old Israel and all ‘virtuous’ Babylonian wives, backfiring disasterously for them, and their husbands—except for King Ahasuerus and Christ, who found genuinely virtuous wives in Esther and The Bride whom blessed their husbands wholly (Jer 29:14).

Pro 6:26  For by means [time-honoured forever] of a whorish woman a man is brought to a piece of bread: and the adulteress will hunt for the precious life.